CP3 is the Real Deal
Man, Chris Paul is no joke. He's like a bigger, stronger Steve Nash. Paul is very much like a quick, powerful, running back in that he dishes out almost as much physical punishment on opposing defenses as they dish out on him. Jordan Farmar and Derek Fisher will certainly be sore tomorrow. The only thing Paul really needs to add to his game at this point is a more consistent outside shot. If he gets that he will immediately become one of the most unstoppable players in the league. With Peja and David West supporting him, the Hornets have a chance to be a much improved team. Like the Lakers (and every other team in the league), the key for Hornets is going to be staying healthy.
I can never decide who the better player is between Deron Williams and Chris Paul. I think Paul has the higher ceiling, but Williams is probably the better player right now. I personally would have taken Deron Williams with the first pick in the 2005 draft. Williams is bigger stronger, and a better shooter. He's not as quick as Paul, but he is still pretty tough to handle off the dribble. Like Paul, he dishes out a lot of punishment when heading to the basket. Williams is more of a half court player than Paul, but he can also play the running game. Williams is also a better defensive player. But I don't really see where Williams can get that much better. He's pretty much as good as he is going to get. Paul still has so many gaps to fill. If his jumper and defense reach the level I eventually expect, he'll end up a better player than Williams. Either way, I think they both are in perfect situations. Williams is the better of the two for Utah's half court sets, and Paul is the better of the two for New Orleans running style. Anyhow, I'm hoping that both the Hornets and Jazz get matched up in a first round playoff match up so that we can see these two go head to head and settle this debate once and for all.

4 comments:
I completely agree with you on almost every point you make in this entry except for the second sentence... When you say CP is bigger and stronger than Nash what exactly do you mean? I always thought of Paul being rather short and when I looked up his player file on NBA.com I found that he is listed at 6-0 175lbs. and Nash is listed at 6-3 178lbs. Otherwise I love CP he is amazing and he played an outstanding game last night. Being a huge Laker fan it was disheartening watching CP put up those numbers but as a CP/NBA fan it's a great flash of what his future could entail.
If he's three inches shorter and the same weight, he's packing more of a punch per inch. He's a load. Nash is more lean. Just take a look at the picture of the two of them. Nash drives and uses finese to get to the rim, while Paul is more physical with the way he gets to the rim.
Also, look at this photo of Paul matched up with Kobe last night. Dude is a little full back...
http://sports.aol.com/fanhouse/2007/11/07/paul-and-peja-are-breaking-records/
Paul is definately strong. The underrated part of his game, IMO, is the way he finishes around the
basket.
I can only imagine how dominant he would be if he were to develop a J. The man is pretty much the second coming of J Kidd, although Paul's J isn't as good(and that's saying something).
Like you, I think Derron is a more complete player right now. But I think Paul is playing a different kind of game. Paul is more of a true point. He has a higher ceiling because the way he plays his position translates to more wins. Paul's one and only goal is to make his teammates better and set them up with open looks. Like Kidd and Nash, the guy was born to play point. There's PGs who think shoot first. There are other PGs who approach the game like a true point, but lack the talent level of a Kidd and of Nash.
But I totally agree with you on Paul developing his J and his D. If he got a respectable J, it would make his penetration that much more effective. He needs that J to keep the D honest.
Finally (sorry I'm just offering my unorganized ramblings), last night hammered home the fact that the guy (and team) feasts off variations of the same play: Set Paul a high pick, watch Paul penetrate, watch Paul pass ball to open teammate for an open J or dunk. True points make it look easy. And they DO make it easy for their teammates.
And finally-finally, just wanted to highlight a point Bill Simmons made some years ago - it's one of the finest tests for a true point:
"Point Guard X gets a steal and finds himself on a two-on-none breakaway with one of his teammates for a free basket. If he doesn't give the freebie to his teammate, he's not a true point guard. Period."
Post a Comment